July 4, 2016 Subject:
Recommended Reading In Spite of What Trolls Say
Little maggot by the name of HarM, chirped:
"It assumes that the reader shares an insanely paranoid world-view.
Fuck YOU, sewer trash. My world-view is not "paranoid" in the least. You didn't even read the book, or read the book from cover to cover, so you don't have the right comment!
Simpletons like YOU take as gospel what the controlled media tells you and close your mind off to the possibility that they may be lying, only presenting half the facts, etc., which they have a very long history of doing.
"Chapter headers provide links to a "white nationalist news portal" - need I say more?"
So what, you biased motherfucker? Just because those are pro-White web sites, does that automatically invalidate them? FYI, I've never found any lies or falsehoods on those sites--unlike mainstream sources, where easily duped clowns like you get your news and info from.
Yeah, material that YOU read.
"don't waste your bandwidth on it."
DON'T YOU TELL ME OR OTHERS WHAT TO READ! We'll read what we like and make up our minds ourselves after we read it, you imperious, willfully ignorant, Leftwing PIG!
May 25, 2012 Subject:
Emerging important topic
September 4, 2007 Subject:
It's possible to write utter rubbish and make it readable. This guy doesn't even have that much talent. It's so poorly written that you have to be a sucker for punishment to read this. I tried and gave up. Argument (if you can call it such) is largely by innuendo and hearsay. It assumes that the reader shares an insanely paranoid world-view. Chapter headers provide links to a "white nationalist news portal" - need I say more? Brain pollution. Don't waste your bandwidth on it.